Funk v. Arnold
George Funk against Peter Arnold
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
It turned out in evidence, that the dam was erected in the Ray’s town branch of Juniata, near the mouth of Dunning’s creek, where it falls into Juniata, and the court ordered the plaintiff to be-called on account oh the variance.
■Plaintiff nonsuit.
MEMORANDUM.
The report of the case of the attorney general and the grantees, under the acts of assembly of 3d April 1792, would follow here; but the author having furnished Mr. Dallas with his report of the case, which is printed totidem verbis in 4Dallas 237, it is therefore omitted in this,publication.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.