TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wilson's Lessee v. Campbell

Wilson's Lessee versus Campbell

Wilson's Lessee v. Campbell, 1 Dall. 126 (Pa. 1785)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 15, 1785
Citations
1 Dall. 1261 U.S. 126
Summary
Ejectment.—Yeates, for the defendant, when called upon at the trial to confess Lease, Entry and Ouster, confessed Lease, Entry, and Ouster for part only of the tenements laid in the declaration. This was opposed by Bradford, who contended, that the defendant having taken general defence, when, he first pleaded, and entered into the common rule, he must now confess Lease, Entry and Ouster as to the whole; but the plaintiff can recover no more than he proves the defendant to be in possession of. 1 Att. Prac. 317.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court:

The defendant must in this case, confess Lease Entry, and Ouster for the whole tenements laid in the declaration * .

This case was determined at N. P Carlisle on the 16 May, 1785, before M'Kean, Chief Justice, &c.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1812–1813: 11838–1839: 21840–1841: 12020–2021: 118122026peak 1838 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Seitzinger v. Ridgway9 Watts 496 (1840)
  2. Jones v. Hartley3 Whart. 178 (1838)
  3. Smith v. Kain2 Tenn. 196 (1812)
  4. Nickle v. M'Farland7 Watts 406 (1838)
  5. (PC) Bland v. CoxNo. 2:20-cv-00715 (E.D. Cal. June 16, 2020)

Most recent

  1. (PC) Bland v. CoxNo. 2:20-cv-00715 (E.D. Cal. June 16, 2020)
  2. Seitzinger v. Ridgway9 Watts 496 (1840)
  3. Nickle v. M'Farland7 Watts 406 (1838)
  4. Jones v. Hartley3 Whart. 178 (1838)
  5. Smith v. Kain2 Tenn. 196 (1812)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list