TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Guthrie v. White

Guthrie Assignee versus White

Guthrie v. White, 1 Dall. 268 (Pa. 1788)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 15, 1788
Citations
1 Dall. 2681 U.S. 268
Summary
A Certiorari was issued to John Culbertson Esq; one of the Justices for the county of Chester, to remove the proceedings in this cause; and the record being accordingly returned, it appeared that one Irwin, having maintained the Defendant’s daughter for several weeks, made out an account against him, and, after swearing to the truth and justice of its contents, he assigned all his right, title, and interest therein to the Plaintiff. The debt being under ten pounds, the Plaintiff, in his own name, sued the father before the Justice upon this assignment, and obtained a judgment and execution against him; although, as it was stated in the Defendant’s deposition, his daughter was of full age at the time of contrasting the debt, and no assumption, upon his part, had been proved or suggested. Bradford moved to reverse the Judgment; 1st, on account of the general irregularity of the proceedings; and 2dly, because an action could not be maintained, by the assignee of a simple contract debt, in his own name.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Court

considered the whole proceedings to have been irregular; but said, that there could be no doubt of the sufficiency of the second reason alone, as a ground for setting them aside. And the Judgment was accordingly reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1889: 11924: 12024: 118892026peak 1889 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kutz v. Dreibelbis17 A. 609 (Pa. 1889)
  2. Cheltenham Township v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.6 Pa. D. & C. 175 (1924)
  3. Whittingham v. Attorney General's OfficeNo. 2:20-cv-00811 (D. Nev. Sept. 29, 2024)

Most recent

  1. Whittingham v. Attorney General's OfficeNo. 2:20-cv-00811 (D. Nev. Sept. 29, 2024)
  2. Cheltenham Township v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.6 Pa. D. & C. 175 (1924)
  3. Kutz v. Dreibelbis17 A. 609 (Pa. 1889)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list