TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Steven Kulovits Trucking & State Workmen's Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Steven Kulovits Trucking and State Workmen's Insurance Fund, Insurance Carrier v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board and Larry C. Miller

Steven Kulovits Trucking & State Workmen's Ins. Fund v. Workmen's Comp. Appeal Bd., 332 A.2d 892 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 18, 1975
Docket
Nos. , No. 755 C.D. 1974
Judges
Kramer, Mencer, Wilkinson
Citations
332 A.2d 89216 Pa. Commw. 4171975 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 713

Opinion of the Court — Kramer

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion by Judge Kramer,

This is an appeal by Steven Kulovits Trucking and State Workmen’s Insurance Fund (hereinafter collectively referred to as Kulovits) from an adjudication by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which awarded compensation to Larry C. Miller (Miller).

Miller was injured in an automobile accident on October 5, 1972, and he filed a claim for workmen’s compensation on October 19, 1972. The primary legal issue involved in Miller’s claim is the question of whether he was in the course of his employment when he was injured. The referee decided Miller was not in the *419 course of his employment when he sustained his injuries and, therefore, denied compensation. On appeal the Board concluded that the referee had erred in concluding that Miller was not in the course of his employment when he was injured and, therefore, the Board reversed the referee and awarded compensation for total disability. Kulovits now appeals to this Court, arguing that Miller was not in the course of his employment when he was injured and that the Board erred when it reversed the referee’s decision.

We are precluded from considering the merits of Kulovits’ appeal because it was not timely filed. Section 427 of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §873 (Supp. 1974-1975), requires that appeals to this Court be taken within 20 days after notice of the Board’s action has been served. Section 406 of the Act, 77 P.S. §717 (Supp. 1974-1975), provides in pertinent part: “any notice or copy shall be deemed served on the date when mailed. ...” The Board’s decision in this case was mailed on May 16, 1974, and Kulovits’ appeal was not filed in this Court until June 6, 1974. In computing statutory time periods, we are required to exclude the first day and include the last day. See Section 1908 of the Statutory Construction Act of 1972, 1 Pa. C.S. §1908. Kulovits’ appeal was filed one day late, and, therefore, this Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. See Findlay Refractories Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 13 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 279 , 320 A. 2d 399 (1974); General v. E. Roseman Co., 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 569 , 312 A. 2d 609 (1973). In accordance with the above, we therefore

Order

And Now, this 18th day of February, 1975, the appeal of Steven Kulovits Trucking and State Workmen’s Insurance Fund is hereby dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1985: 22011: 119852026peak 1985 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Peace v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare501 A.2d 1164 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1985)
  2. Gladstone Partners, LP v. East Union Township26 A.3d 542 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011)
  3. State Industrial Insurance System v. Partlow-Hursh696 P.2d 462 (Nev. 1985)

Most recent

  1. Gladstone Partners, LP v. East Union Township26 A.3d 542 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011)
  2. Peace v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare501 A.2d 1164 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1985)
  3. State Industrial Insurance System v. Partlow-Hursh696 P.2d 462 (Nev. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Gen. v. E. Roseman Co., 312 A.2d 609 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1973) 7
Findlay Refractories Co. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeal Bd., 320 A.2d 399 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1974) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list