TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Sale of Properties by Indiana County Tax Claim Bureau for Unpaid Tax Claims

In Re: Sale of Properties by Indiana County Tax Claim Bureau for Unpaid Tax Claims. Gertrude Wanchisn

In re Sale of Props. by Ind. Cnty. Tax Claim Bureau for Unpaid Tax Claims, 348 A.2d 440 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 3, 1975
Docket
Nos. , No. 617 C.D. 1975
Judges
Blatt, Bowman, Crumlish, Kramer, Mencer, Rogers, Wilkinson
Citations
348 A.2d 44022 Pa. Commw. 1471975 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1299

Opinion of the Court — Rogers

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion by Judge Rogers,

Mrs. Gertrude Wanchisn has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Indiana County dismissing objections to the tax sale of her properties in South Mahoning Township. Mrs. Wanchisn’s properties were two parcels of coal, one containing 50 acres and the other 11 acres.

Mrs. Wanchism failed to pay the 1972 taxes and the Tax Claim Bureau of Indiana County, pursuant to the Real Estate Tax Sale Law, Act of July 7, 1947, P.L. 1368, as amended, 72 P.S. §5860.101 et seq., scheduled a sale of the properties for September 9, 1974. A notice of the sale was sent to and received by Mrs. Wanchisn and the sale was duly advertised. The Tax Claim Bureau did not, however, post notice of the sale on the properties.

Section 602 of the Real Estate Tax Sale Law, 72 P.S. §5860.602, provides that the Tax Claim Bureau shall give notice of any scheduled sale by advertisement, by mail, “and by posting on the property.”

After the sale of her properties by the Bureau Mrs. Wanchisn filed her objection to the failure of the Bureau to post the properties. At the hearing conducted in the court below, counsel for the Tax Claim Bureau stated that the Bureau had “never posted when coal only is involved, simply because we do not feel there is any way to post.” Mrs. Mary Kathryn Frantz, Mrs. Wanchisn’s daughter, testified that her mother is 79 years old, forgetful about business affairs and that she, Mrs. Frantz, had been attempting for some time to sell her mother’s coal properties. She stated that she had been at their location on Labor Day, September 2, 1974, with a prospective buyer, on which occasion she might have seen a posted notice if one had been provided.

*149 The lower court dismissed Mrs. Wanchisn’s objections on the ground that, since she received the mailed notice of the sales, there was no necessity to post. This was error. The court below may have had in mind an earlier version of Section 602, 72 P.S. §5860.602, which indeed required posting only when the mailed notice was not received by the taxpayer.

The notice provisions of tax sale statutes must be strictly complied with in order to guard against the deprivation of property without due process of law. Price-Jeffries Co., Inc. v. Tillman, 11 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 153 , 312 A.2d 494 (1973).

The Bureau’s argument that it would be absurd to construe the statute to mandate the posting of coal because the Bureau would have to place the notice underground where no one would see it is without merit. The owner of subsurface coal has the right to use the surface to extract his coal. Schuster v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 395 Pa. 441 , 149 A.2d 447 (1959). The Tax Claim Bureau has the same power to post notices of tax sales of coal on the surface thus encumbered by the coal owner’s rights as it has to post properties which happen to exist on the surface.

Order reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1977: 21978: 11979: 11980: 31981: 11982: 21987: 11991: 12004: 119772026peak 1980 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. AG Properties, Inc. Appeal452 A.2d 893 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1982)
  2. In re Tax Sale of September 12, 1977, under the Real Estate Tax Law of 1947452 A.2d 893 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1982)
  3. Guseman v. Vlahovski46 Pa. D. & C.3d 177 (1987)
  4. Lahr v. Faleski7 Pa. D. & C.3d 315 (1977)
  5. In re Upset Sale, Tax Claim Bureau410 A.2d 376 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1980)
  6. In re Tax Sale of 2003 Upset860 A.2d 1184 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2004) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. In re Tax Sale of 2003 Upset860 A.2d 1184 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2004) · Dissent
  2. In re the City of Scranton for Validation of Tax Title & Approval of Sale of Real Estate600 A.2d 705 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991)
  3. Guseman v. Vlahovski46 Pa. D. & C.3d 177 (1987)
  4. AG Properties, Inc. Appeal452 A.2d 893 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1982)
  5. In re Tax Sale of September 12, 1977, under the Real Estate Tax Law of 1947452 A.2d 893 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1982)
  6. Little Appeal18 Pa. D. & C.3d 19 (1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Schuster v. Pa. Tpk. Comm'n, 149 A.2d 447 (Pa. 1959) 38
Price-Jeffries Co. v. Tillman, 312 A.2d 494 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1973) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list