TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McKeesport Area School District v. Commonwealth

McKeesport Area School District and Kiski Area School District v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Education, Joseph Wilks and Helen Wilks, his wife, Intervenors

McKeesport Area Sch. Dist. v. Commonwealth, 392 A.2d 912 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 25, 1978
Docket
Nos. , No. 934 C.D. 1977
Judges
Blatt, Bowman, Craig, Crumlish, Disalle, MacPhail, Menoer, Rogers, Wilkinson
Citations
392 A.2d 91238 Pa. Commw. 2901978 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1377

Opinion of the Court — Rogers

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion by Judge Rogers,

McKeesport Area School District and Kiski Area School District have filed a petition for review of the order of the Acting Secretary of Education requiring them to transport school children in accordance with the Secretary’s interpretation of Section 1361 of the Public School Code of 1949. No issue of law or fact distinguishes this case from earlier cases decided by this Court and upholding the Secretary’s interpretation of the Act and the Act’s constitutionality as so interpreted. We will therefore enter an order essentially the same as the one made in those cases, which are: School District of Pittsburgh v. Commonwealth *292 Department of Education and Joseph Scott, 33 Pa. Commonwealth. Ct. 535, 382 A.2d 772 (1978); Springfield School District v. Commonwealth Department of Education, 35 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 71 , 384 A.2d 1049 (1978); Pequea Valley School District v. Commonwealth Department of Education and Fabio Pini, 36 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 403 , 387 A.2d 1022 (1978).

Order

And Now, this 25th day of October, 1978, paragraph 3 of the Secretary of Education’s final order dated April 11,1977 requiring the respondent districts to “transport all eligible non-public school children beyond the school district boundaries in accordance with the ten mile mandated requirement in Act 3.72” is affirmed ; paragraph 4 thereof is vacated in its entirety, without prejudice to the Secretary’s right to take future action with regard to subsidy as provided by law.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1980: 11983: 119802026peak 1980 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Pequea Valley Sch. Dist. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Educ., 387 A.2d 1022 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1978) 8
Springfield Sch. Dist. v. Commonwealth, 384 A.2d 1049 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1978) 5
Sch. Dist. v. Commonwealth, 382 A.2d 772 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1978) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list