Commonwealth v. Gosha
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edward Gosha, Administrator, Estate of Minnie Williams, Appellee City of Philadelphia v. Edward Gosha, Administrator, Estate of Minnie Williams
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Opinion by Judge Palladino,
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (¡Commonwealth) appeals here from an opinion and order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) which denied the Commonwealth’s and the City of Philadelphia’s alternative motions for judgment n.o.v. or a new trial. We affirm.
Inasmuch as (1) the issues raised by the Commonwealth before this Court are identical to those raised before the trial court and (2) we conclude, after a careful review of the record and applicable case law, that the trial court correctly disposed of these issues, we affirm on the basis of the able and comprehensive opinion of the Honorable I. Raymond Keemeb in Edward Gosha, Administrator of the Estate of Minnie Williams v. City of Philadelphia et al., 30 Pa. D. & C. 3d 190 (1982).
Obdeb
And Now, August 8, 1984, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County at No. 6032 is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.