Greenleaf v. Kellogg
Lucy Greenleaf versus Elijah Kellogg
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The defendant’s counsel stated that the defence relied on was, that no action is maintainable on such a note as this until after the principal sum should fall due. But the Court were decidedly of opinion that such a defence was insufficient, and gave judgment for the interest in arrear, and for the interest of each year’s interest, from the day it was payable to the time of rendering the judgment. (b)
Hastings vs. Wiswall, 8 Mass. Rep. 455 . — Cooley vs. Rose, 3 Mass. Rep. 221 .— Stearns & Al. vs. Brown & Ux. 1 Pick. 350 . — Barrel & Al. vs. Joy, 6 Mass. Rep. 221
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.