TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Niles v. Sawtell

Nathaniel Niles versus Nathaniel Sawtell

Niles v. Sawtell, 7 Mass. 444 (1811)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 15, 1811
Citations
7 Mass. 444
Headnotes
In an action on a covenant of warranty of lands brought by one who has assigned his interest in the lands to another, the declaration must show that the plaintiff is answerable to his assignee.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

, The plaintiff declares in a plea of covenant broken, upon a deed of the defendant, by which he, as collector of taxes for the plantation of Bakerstown, conveyed to one John Glover, in fee simple, certain lands in Poland, formerly part of Bakerstown, with a covenant of general warranty to Glove", his heirs and assigns, against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. The declaration then alleges a conveyance of the lands from Glover to the plaintiff in fee, and an eviction of one Joseph Thurlo, “ assignee *371 of the plaintiff of the same lands, by the proprietors of Bdkerstown, * by virtue of a lawful title and claim [ *445 ] thereto; whereby the said plaintiff, as the assignee of the said lands, and his assigns, remain undefended against the lawful claims of all persons.”

Whitman for the plaintiff.

The defendant pleaded eight several pleas in bar, to several oí which the plaintiff demurred, and the defendant joined in demurrer

The cause was coming on for argument at this term, when Emery, of counsel for the defendant, suggested that there was no allegation in the plaintiff’s declaration that he was answerable to Thurlo, his assignee, on account of the eviction stated; and that without such allegation he had shown no cause of action against the defend ant. And of this opinion was the Court. The plaintiff thereupon obtained leave to amend his declaration, to which, when amended, the defendant had liberty to plead anew.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1847–1848: 21849–1850: 11851–1852: 21861–1862: 11927–1928: 11967–1968: 118472026peak 1847 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Reid v. Barry112 So. 846 (Fla. 1927)
  2. City of Little Rock v. Linn432 S.W.2d 455 (Ark. 1968)
  3. Burdine v. Grand Lodge of Alabama37 Ala. 478 (1861)
  4. Redwine v. Brown10 Ga. 311 (1851)
  5. Wardens & Vestry of Trinity Church v. Hall22 Conn. 125 (1852)
  6. Claunch v. Allen12 Ala. 159 (1847)

Most recent

  1. City of Little Rock v. Linn432 S.W.2d 455 (Ark. 1968)
  2. Reid v. Barry112 So. 846 (Fla. 1927)
  3. Burdine v. Grand Lodge of Alabama37 Ala. 478 (1861)
  4. Wardens & Vestry of Trinity Church v. Hall22 Conn. 125 (1852)
  5. Redwine v. Brown10 Ga. 311 (1851)
  6. Morrison v. Underwood20 N.H. 369 (1850)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list