TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Colby v. Dillingham

Philip Colby versus Pitt Dillingham and Others

Colby v. Dillingham, 7 Mass. 475 (1811)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 15, 1811
Citations
7 Mass. 475
Headnotes
A coroner, who is also deputy sheriff, may serve process upon another deputy of the sheriff.
Summary
In a" case stated by the parties in this action, it was agreed that the defendant Dillingham is a deputy sheriff for this county; that the original writ in the action was directed to the coroners of the county, or any of them, and was served on all the defendants by Daniel Evans, a coroner for the county, duly qualified, and also a deputy sheriff of the same county, occasionally executing the duties of each of those offices. If the Court should be of opinion that Evans could servo said writ, and that the service thereof by him as coroner, was correct and legal, it was agreed that judgment should be rendered for the plaintiff for a sum stated; otherwise the plaintiff should become nonsuit, and the defendants recover their costs.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Court

observed that it was improper to bring a matter, which, if there was any question upon it, was proper for a plea in abatement to the writ, before them in the form of a case stated. But, as the question regarded practice, and they entertained no doubts upon it, they would express their opinion, that Evans, in his *398 character of coroner, might well serve the writ. The sheriff was answerable for his conduct as one of his deputies, but not for his doings as a coroner.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list