Dickey v. Sleeper
John Dickey versus Manassah Sleeper
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
By the Court.
The intention of the parties to this submission was, to effect a final adjustment of the concerns of a trading company, in which they had been connected, and *of which, it should seem, the plaintiff had been the agent. One of the company, George Cox, was dead, and, it appears, a considerable sum of money was due to his estate from the company. John Cox, naming himself administrator of the deceased, became a party to the submission ; and the arbitrators awarded him a sum of money in his capacity of administrator. In this they did not exceed their powers. But, if they had in that particular, the defendant could not avail himself of it. The bond is the several deed of each obligor. The signature, also, of John Cox must be taken with reference to the description of him in the bond.
Replication adjudged good.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.