TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Barrett v. Porter

James Barrett versus Aaron Porter

Barrett v. Porter, 14 Mass. 143 (1817)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 15, 1817
Citations
14 Mass. 143
Headnotes
Where it appeared, on the return of an extent of an execution on land, that three appraisers were appointed and sworn, and that all the three had acted in the appraisement, although the certificate was subscribed by two only, and no reason given why the third did not subscribe, it was holden, that the return might be sustained, (1) Where, at the time of the conveyance of land, a part of it was under attachment at the suit of a creditor of the grantor, and afterwards execution in the same suit was extended thereon, this was holden to be an encumbrance within the covenant in the deed, that the title was free from encumbrances. The extent was holden to be an eviction; and the appraised value of the land extended upon was made the measure of damages.
Summary
In covenant broken, on a conveyance of land with a covenant that the premises granted were free of encumbrances, it was agreed that, prior to the conveyance, a creditor of the grantor had attached the same land on mesne process, and after the conveyance had extended his execution on a part thereof.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Court

observed that here was an actual eviction under a paramount title, and as this had been ruled, in the * case last cited, to be a breach of the covenant against encumbrances, the proper measure of damages would be the sum at which the land was appraised, with interest thereon from the time of the eviction ; and judgment was entered accordingly upon the default of the defendant.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1821–1822: 11823–1824: 11825–1826: 11837–1838: 21839–1840: 118212026peak 1837 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mitchell v. Warner5 Conn. 497 (1825)
  2. Chapel v. Bull17 Mass. 213 (1821)
  3. Moffitt v. Jaquins19 Mass. 331 (1824)
  4. Phillips v. Williams14 Me. 411 (1837)
  5. Munroe v. Reding15 Me. 153 (1838)
  6. Bryant v. Russell40 Mass. 508 (1839)

Most recent

  1. Bryant v. Russell40 Mass. 508 (1839)
  2. Munroe v. Reding15 Me. 153 (1838)
  3. Phillips v. Williams14 Me. 411 (1837)
  4. Mitchell v. Warner5 Conn. 497 (1825)
  5. Moffitt v. Jaquins19 Mass. 331 (1824)
  6. Chapel v. Bull17 Mass. 213 (1821)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list