Wilder v. Whittemore
Sarah Wilder versus Benjamin Whittemore
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
By the Court.
It is clear that the plea in bar does not show a performance of the condition of the deed; for it is nowhere stipulated therein that the mortgagees shall be obliged to receive their support in the house of the mortgagor, or of any of his assignees On the contrary, wherever they choose to live, they have a right to *243 be supported, according to this contract, so that they do not create needless expense to the mortgagor, or those holding under him.
The demandant has a right, therefore, to the possession of * the estate, unless the mortgagor will pray for the conditional judgment; in which case, an estimate may be made of the time during which she has been left without support, and judgment nisi, &c., may then be entered, (a)
Vide Jackson vs. Florence, 16 Johns, 47.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.