Kent v. County Commissioners for County of Essex
Mary Kent, versus The County Commissioners for the County of Essex
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
A question was now suggested, whether if the road was m fact laid out in the lifetime of the husband, he being seised of the estate in right of his wife, the damages were not rightly awarded to him-, as a chose in action accruing during the coverture, and whether as such they would not go to the adminis *533 trator of the husband, and not to the widow. 1 And it appearing that the estate was under administration, the Court directed that notice should be given to the administrator to appear and show cause against the claim of the petitioner.
The husband is entitled to the damages paid for land of his wife taken for a highway. Emerson v. Cutler, 14 Pick. 108 , 118, 119. Such damages may now be secured to the wife, under Revised Stat. c. 77, § 17.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.