TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Collins v. Canty

Michael Collins v. John Canty

Collins v. Canty, 60 Mass. 415 (1850)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 15, 1850
Citations
60 Mass. 4156 Allen 415
Headnotes
If a lessor, after giving the lessee a general notice to quit, accepts rent for a time subsequent to the expiration of the notice, he thereby waives the notice, and admits the continuance of the tenancy
Summary
This was a proceeding under the Rev. Sts. c. L04, § 4, to recover possession of leased premises by the landlord, and was submitted to the court of common pleas, from whence it came to this court by appeal, upon the following agreed statement of facts: — The defendant, at the time of the commencement of the process, was in the occupation of the premises, at a rent of $7 a month, payable monthly. On the 7th of August, 1849, at which time there was no rent due, the plaintiff gave the defendant a written notice to quit, in the following form: — “ You being in possession of the basement story of my house, situated on Tremont street, in the city of Roxbury aforesaid, are hereby notified to quit and deliver up to. me the premises aforesaid, according to law. Hereof fail not, or I shall take a due course of law to eject you from the same.” And no other notice to quit was ever given him. On the 3d of September, 1849, the plaintiff commenced a suit for possession, which was continued until the 17th of September, when the plaintiff became nonsuit. On the 19th of September, 1849, the defendant paid the plaintiff all the rent due, up to that time, and two days afterwards, before any further rent had accrued, the plaintiff commenced the present proceeding. On the 14th of January, during the pendency of the action in the court of common pleas, the defendant paid and the plaintiff received $15, on account of the rent of the premises.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court.

The acceptance of rent, as rent, for a time subsequent to the expiration of the notice, was an admission of the continuance of the tenancy, and a waiver of the notice; so that the plaintiff cannot recover.

Judgment for the defendant.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1906: 11919: 11930: 219062026peak 1930 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mayo v. Claflin106 A. 653 (Vt. 1919)
  2. Arcade Investment Co. v. Gieriet109 N.W. 250 (Minn. 1906)
  3. Morales v. Martínez40 P.R. Dec. 724 (1930)
  4. Morales v. Martínez40 P.R. 695 (1930)

Most recent

  1. Morales v. Martínez40 P.R. 695 (1930)
  2. Morales v. Martínez40 P.R. Dec. 724 (1930)
  3. Mayo v. Claflin106 A. 653 (Vt. 1919)
  4. Arcade Investment Co. v. Gieriet109 N.W. 250 (Minn. 1906)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list