TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Goddard v. Chaffee

Nahum P. Goddard v. Orrin W. Chaffee

Goddard v. Chaffee, 84 Mass. 395 (1861)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 15, 1861
Judges
Merrick
Citations
84 Mass. 395
Headnotes
A violin and bow of a debtor whose sole business is that of a musician, as a member of a military and quadrille band, and who obtains most of his support by playing upon his violin, are exempt from attachment, if the value of all his musical instruments is less than one hundred dollars.
Summary
Tort against a deputy sheriff, for taking the plaintiff’s violin and bow by virtue of a writ of attachment against him. At the trial in the superior court, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, by Morton, J., upon agreed facts, which are stated in the opinion ; and the defendant appealed to this court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Merrick

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Merrick, J.

The statute exempts from attachment the implements of a debtor necessary for carrying on his trade or business and not exceeding one hundred dollars in value. Gen. Sts. c. 133, § 32. “ Business ” is a word of large signification, and denotes the employment or occupation in which a person is engaged tc procure a living. The plaintiff is a musician, and *396 has for some years been employed in playing upon musical instruments, as a member of military and quadrille bands. He has in that way obtained his whole support and livelihood, has been engaged in no other pursuit, and has had no other trade or employment. That therefore is his business; and the only instruments owned and used by him in pursuing it are a violin and cornet, the united value of which is less than one. hundred dollars. The violin is a small instrument played upon exclusively by the hand; and upon the facts agreed it is obviously essential to make his labor available, and enable him to do the work and render the service which he contracts to perform. In this view, in conformity to the interpretation heretofore given, to the provisions of the statute, it was clearly exempt from liability to attachment or seizure upon execution. Wilson v. Elliot, 7 Gray, 69 . The defendant must therefore be defaulted, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for the damages agreed upon by the parties.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 11919: 21923: 119142026peak 1919 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Vandalia Railroad v. Stillwell104 N.E. 289 (Ind. 1914)
  2. Coyle v. Donaldson108 A. 308 (N.J. 1919)
  3. Colburn v. Addison173 N.W. 35 (Iowa 1919)
  4. Bailey v. School District No. 5204 A.D. 125 (1923) · Concurrence

Most recent

  1. Bailey v. School District No. 5204 A.D. 125 (1923) · Concurrence
  2. Coyle v. Donaldson108 A. 308 (N.J. 1919)
  3. Colburn v. Addison173 N.W. 35 (Iowa 1919)
  4. Vandalia Railroad v. Stillwell104 N.E. 289 (Ind. 1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list