TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Roberts v. Bassett

Elizabeth Roberts & others v. Joseph R. Bassett

Roberts v. Bassett, 105 Mass. 409 (1870)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 15, 1870
Judges
Morton
Citations
105 Mass. 409
Headnotes
A contract to convey, “ by a deed conveying a clear title, that parcel of land on the cornel of A. and B. Streets, and owned by the vendors,” is not satisfied hy the tender of a warranty deed conveying “ that parcel of land on the comer of A. and B. Streets, now owned by the grantors,” if there is an incumbrance on the land.
Summary
Bill in equity for the specific performance of a contract by which the defendant agreed to purchase, and the plaintiffs to convey to the defendant, his heirs and assigns forever, “ by a good and sufficient deed, conveying a clear title thereto, free from all incumbrances except lease, all that parcel of land situated on the corner of Lynde and Green Streets, in Boston, and owned by th/ vendors or either of them.” At the hearing, before Colt, J., it appeared that the plaintiffs tendered to the defendant a warranty deed conveying “ all that parcel of land situated on the corner of Lynde Street and Green Stréet, in Boston, now owned by the grantors or either of them,” but that the defendant refused to accept it. It also appeared that the plaintiffs owned on the corner of said streets a parcel of land which was subject to the right of one Hall to place a wall upon a strip of the land six inches wide along the whole.southerly line, with the right of opening in the wall, when erected, windows to be forever open and unobstructed. The defendant contended that he was not bound to accept the deed; but the judge ordered a decree to be entered for the plaintiffs, and, at the request of the defendant, reported the case for the revision of the full court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Morton

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Morton, J.

By the reasonable construction of the contract between the parties, the defendant is entitled to a deed which shall convey a clear title to the land free from all incumbrances except the existing lease. He agreed to purchase the land, and not merely such estate or interest in it as the plaintiffs had. The words “ and owned by the vendors or either of them ” are merely words of description, intended to identify the parcel of land. *410 which is not fully described in the contract. The deed tendered by the plaintiffs would convey only such title as they had, which was a title subject to important incumbrances beside the lease. As the defendant’s contract was for a clear title, and not for a warranty deed, he was not bound to accept the deed tendered to him. Mead v. Fox, 6 Cush. 199 . Packard v. Usher, 7 Gray, 529 . Bill dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1912: 11924: 11926: 21928: 21932: 11944: 11951: 12008: 119122026peak 1926 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ogg v. Herman227 P. 476 (Mont. 1924)
  2. Olszewski v. Sardynski56 N.E.2d 607 (Mass. 1944)
  3. Ott v. Pickard237 S.W.2d 109 (Mo. 1951)
  4. Gantt v. Harper267 P. 296 (Mont. 1928)
  5. Veselka v. Forres283 S.W. 303 (Tex. App. 1926)
  6. Holoubek v. Romshek749 N.W.2d 901 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008)

Most recent

  1. Holoubek v. Romshek749 N.W.2d 901 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008)
  2. Ott v. Pickard237 S.W.2d 109 (Mo. 1951)
  3. Olszewski v. Sardynski56 N.E.2d 607 (Mass. 1944)
  4. Bliss v. Schlund242 N.W. 436 (Neb. 1932)
  5. Gantt v. Harper267 P. 296 (Mont. 1928)
  6. Condorodis v. Kling169 N.E. 836 (Ohio Ct. App. 1928)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list