TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lincoln v. Lincoln

Gasoline M. Lincoln v. Gboeoe T. Lincoln

Lincoln v. Lincoln, 107 Mass. 590 (1871)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 15, 1871
Judges
Tttf
Citations
107 Mass. 590
Headnotes
A residuary gift in a will, to J. S. without words of inheritance, conveys the fee, and not a mere life estate, in land to which it applies.
Summary
Conteact upon a written agreement of the defendant, dated October 20, 1870, to pay $7166 to the plaintiff in consideration that she should convey to him “ an absolute inheritable title ” to a parcel of land in Leominster “ by a good warranty deed with usual covenants.” The plaintiff was the widow of Luke Lincoln of Leominster, who died seised and possessed of the land and left a will which was duly proved and allowed before the date of said agreement and of which the plaintiff was executrix. After a specific legacy to the testator’s daughter, who was his only heir, the will contained the following clause: “ The rest and residue of all my property, personal, real or mixed, (after paying all just and lawful demands against my estate,) I give and bequeath to my beloved wife, Caroline M. Lincoln.” The foregoing facts were agreed, and the only question thereon was whether the plaintiff took “ an absolute inheritable title ” in the land, subject to the payment of the debts and legacy. If she did, judgment was to be rendered for her for a stated sum; otherwise, for the defendant.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Tttf

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By tttf. Court.

It is too well settled to need the citation of any authorities, that these words give to the devisee an estate in fee.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1875–1876: 11881–1882: 11885–1886: 11899–1900: 11903–1904: 11937–1938: 118752026peak 1875 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hooper v. Bradbury133 Mass. 303 (1882)
  2. Robinson v. Randolph21 Fla. 629 (1885)
  3. Gilkie v. Marsh71 N.E. 703 (Mass. 1904)
  4. Muhlke v. Tiedemann52 N.E. 843 (Ill. 1899)
  5. Crossman v. Field119 Mass. 170 (1875)
  6. Dean Et v. Hart23 Ohio Law. Abs. 617 (1937)

Most recent

  1. Dean Et v. Hart23 Ohio Law. Abs. 617 (1937)
  2. Gilkie v. Marsh71 N.E. 703 (Mass. 1904)
  3. Muhlke v. Tiedemann52 N.E. 843 (Ill. 1899)
  4. Robinson v. Randolph21 Fla. 629 (1885)
  5. Hooper v. Bradbury133 Mass. 303 (1882)
  6. Crossman v. Field119 Mass. 170 (1875)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list