TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Allen v. Fuller

William H. Allen & another v. Lydia A. Fuller & another

Allen v. Fuller, 118 Mass. 402 (1875)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 23, 1875
Citations
118 Mass. 4021875 Mass. LEXIS 382
Headnotes
In an action to recover the price of goods sold, evidence that they were charged on the plaintiffs books to another person, is not conclusive evidence that they were not sold to the defendant. In an action on a promissory note signed by a married woman, the judge before whom the case was tried, without a jury, found as a fact that the note was given for goods sold to her on her sole credit, and ruled that she was liable therefor, although she received no benefit therefrom. Held, that the ruling was right.
Summary
Contract on two promissory notes, signed by the female defendant as principal, and Joseph N. Fuller, her husband, as surety. Trial in the Superior Court, without a jury, before Ba con, J., who allowed a bill of exceptions in substance as follows: The defendant Joseph hi. Fuller was defaulted. There was evidence tending to show that the goods sold, for which these notes were given, were sold on the sole credit of Lydia A. Fuller, wife of Joseph N. Fuller. There was also evidence tending to show that the goods were sold and delivered to the husband on his sole credit, the same being charged to him on the plaintiffs’ books, and that the wife, Lydia A., received no benefit from the goods sold, and none of the avails thereof came to her use. Upon the whole evidence, the judge found as a fact that the goods were sold to the wife on her sole credit, and ruled that she was liable therefor, although she received no benefit therefrom, and they were not used on her estate, and found for the plaintiff; and the defendant Lydia A. alleged exceptions to said ruling.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court.

Evidence that the goods were charged to the husband on the plaintiffs’ books was not conclusive that they were sold to him. James v. Spaulding, 4 Gray, 451 . The judge below, having found as a fact that the goods were sold to the wife and on her credit, rightly ruled as matter of law that she was liable therefor. Spaulding v. Day, 10 Allen, 96 . Labaree v. Colby, 99 Mass. 559 . Wilder v. Richie, 117 Mass. 382 .

Exceptions overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1877–1878: 21905–1906: 21969–1970: 118772026peak 1877 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Holmes v. Hunt122 Mass. 505 (1877)
  2. Pettey v. Benoit79 N.E. 245 (Mass. 1906)
  3. Caldwell v. Blanchard77 N.E. 1036 (Mass. 1906)
  4. Nourse v. Henshaw123 Mass. 96 (1877)
  5. Hilliard v. You-Do-It Electronics Hobby Center, Inc.43 Mass. App. Dec. 145 (1969)

Most recent

  1. Hilliard v. You-Do-It Electronics Hobby Center, Inc.43 Mass. App. Dec. 145 (1969)
  2. Pettey v. Benoit79 N.E. 245 (Mass. 1906)
  3. Caldwell v. Blanchard77 N.E. 1036 (Mass. 1906)
  4. Nourse v. Henshaw123 Mass. 96 (1877)
  5. Holmes v. Hunt122 Mass. 505 (1877)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Labaree v. Colby, 99 Mass. 559 (1868) 8
Wilder v. Richie, 117 Mass. 382 (1875) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list