TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rindge v. Kimball

Samuel B. Rindge v. William H. Kimball

Rindge v. Kimball, 124 Mass. 209 (1878)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 6, 1878
Citations
124 Mass. 2091878 Mass. LEXIS 269
Headnotes
A waiver of demand and notice upon a promissory note is as effectual after as before the maturity of the note.
Summary
Contract upon a promissory note for $500, payable to the order of the defendant, and indorsed by him to the plaintiff. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Pitman, J., without a jury, it appeared that no demand had been made on the note er notice of non-payment given to the defendant; but it was admitted that the defendant wrote on the back of the note the words, “Waive demand and notice.” The evidence was'conflicting upon the question whether these words were written before or after the note was due. The defendant testified that he wrote these words upon the note intelligently and intentionally, with a full knowledge of all the material facts. The judge ruled that such a waiver of demand and notice was as effectual after as before the maturity of the note, and ordered judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant alleged exceptions.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court.

This point has been repeatedly determined by recent decisions of this court, and should not have been brought up again. Matthews v. Allen, 16 Gray, 594 . Harrison v. Bailey, 99 Mass. 620 . Third National Bank v. Ashworth, 105 Mass. 503 . Exceptions overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1889: 11891: 11906: 11917: 118892026peak 1889 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Thompson v. Curry91 S.E. 801 (W. Va. 1917)
  2. Parks v. Smith28 N.E. 1044 (Mass. 1891)
  3. Hobbs v. Straine21 N.E. 365 (Mass. 1889)
  4. Burgettstown National Bank v. Nill63 A. 186 (Pa. 1906)

Most recent

  1. Thompson v. Curry91 S.E. 801 (W. Va. 1917)
  2. Burgettstown National Bank v. Nill63 A. 186 (Pa. 1906)
  3. Parks v. Smith28 N.E. 1044 (Mass. 1891)
  4. Hobbs v. Straine21 N.E. 365 (Mass. 1889)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Harrison v. Bailey, 99 Mass. 620 (1868) 12
Third Nat'l Bank v. Ashworth, 105 Mass. 503 (1870) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list