TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Moran v. Hollings

Elizabeth Moran, administratrix v. Richard Hollings & another Elizabeth Moran v. Same

Moran v. Hollings, 125 Mass. 93 (1878)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 24, 1878
Citations
125 Mass. 931878 Mass. LEXIS 26
Headnotes
An action for personal injuries caused by falling a distance of forty feet, and resulting in instant death on reaching the ground, cannot be maintained.
Summary
Two actions of tort. The first was brought by the plaintiff as administratrix, for personal injuries occasioned to her intestate, John J. Carey, a boy sixteen years old, while in the employ of the defendants. The second was brought by the plaintiff as surviving parent of the deceased, for the loss of services arising from the same accident. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Dewey, J., the plaintiff offered to show that, by reason of the negligence of the defendants, Carey fell a distance of forty feet, through four hatchways, and was instantly killed by striking on the lower floor of the defendants’ building. The plaintiff also contended that Carey, in falling through the hatchways, might have struck against some obstacle, thereby receiving injuries from which he might have recovered, but no evidence was offered on this point, except as above stated. Upon the foregoing offers of proof, the judge ruled that the actions could not be maintained; and directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendants in each case. The plaintiff alleged exceptions.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court.

The plaintiff cannot, either as her son’s administratrix or as his surviving parent, maintain an action for his death, and there was no proof of injuries during his lifetime for which damages could be recovered. Carey v. Berkshire Railroad, 1 Cush. 475 . Kearney v. Boston & Worcester Railroad, 9 Cush. 108 . Kennedy v. Standard Sugar Refinery, ante, 90.

Exceptions overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1882–1883: 11892–1893: 11900–1901: 21902–1903: 11904–1905: 11908–1909: 11912–1913: 11914–1915: 11962–1963: 21972–1973: 118822026peak 1900 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list