Terry v. Brightman
Joseph C. Terry v. James M. Brightman & another
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Morton, C. J.
Under the modern practice in this Commonwealth, an appeal, bill of exceptions or report does not transfer to this court the whole case, but only the questions of law to be revised, unless the court, upon deciding those questions, sees fit to order the record of the whole case to be transferred to this court for trial or other disposition thereof. Pub. Sts. a. 150, §§ 7, 12; g. 153, §§ 8, 15. The case remains in the court in which it was brought, whether the Supreme Judicial Court for the county or the Superior Court.
When a rescript has been sent down by this court disposing of the questions of law raised, it is the duty of the clerk to make the entry on the docket according to the rescript. But this entry is not a judgment. As the jurisdiction of the case is in the court below, the effective final judgment must be entered by that court, either by a special order or by the general order usual at the close of the term.
The decisions of this court upon the questions of law reserved are binding upon the lower court. But when, after a rescript, it appears to that court in which the case is pending that the ends of justice and the due determination of the rights of the parties require that the judgment should be suspended or the verdict set aside, it has the right to do so, unless it be inconsistent with the decision by this court of the questions of law upon which it has passed. Commonwealth v. Scott, 123 Mass. 418 . Platt v. Justices of the Superior Court, 124 Mass. 353 . Loring v. Salisbury Mills, 125 Mass. 138 .
Applying these principles to the case at bar, it was within the power of the Superior Court, after the rescript was sent down, to suspend the judgment, and to allow an amendment changing the suit at law to a suit in equity, at least during the first term, and before any final judgment had been entered by that court by a special or general order. Such action of the Superior Court is not inconsistent with the decision of this court, as stated in the rescript, of the questions of law reserved for its determination.
As it was within the power of the Superior Court, the question whether the amendment should be allowed was addressed to the discretion of the presiding justice of that court, and no exception lies to his decision. George v. Reed, 101 Mass. 378 .
Exceptions overruled.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 18 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.