Carter v. Peak
Josiah H. Carter v. John C. Peak & another
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Morton, C. J.
The lien for the taxes assessed in 1881 was an incumbrance upon the estate existing at the time the defendant gave his deed to Hallett. The covenant in that deed against incumbrances was broken as soon as it was made, and a right of action for the breach immediately accrued in favor of Hallett. At common law this right of action is not assignable. • This rule, if applicable, prevents the plaintiff from maintaining this action. Clark v. Swift, 3 Met. 390 .
But he contends that he is entitled to maintain it under our statute, which provides that “ whoever conveys real estate by deed or mortgage containing a covenant that it is free from all incumbrances when an incumbrance ■ appears of record to exist thereon, whether known or unknown to him, shall be liable in an action of contract to the grantee, his heirs, executor, administrator, successors, or assigns, for all damages sustained .in removing the same.” Pub. Sts. e. 126, § 18. Gen. Sts. c. 89, § 17-
By our system, the registry of deeds is the proper place for recording deeds or instruments conveying land, or any interest therein, and when the Legislature speaks of such deed or instrument as being recorded, or as appearing of record, the fair *441 inference, unless controlled by the context, is that it refers to the registry of deeds, the place where any person examining a title would look for such records. The provision we are considering was first passed in 1855. St. 1855, e. 177, § 3. The phraseology there used was “ when by the records incumbrances appear to exist thereon.” The words “ by the records ” point more definitely to the registry of deeds, the place where the law requires the records by which an incumbrance would appear to be kept. We are of opinion that by these words, and by the words “ appears of record,” used in the General Statutes and in the Public Statutes, and intended to be equivalent words, the Legislature meant the records in the registry of deeds; and that the section we are considering does not include the case where incumbrances appear to exist by the records of a court, or of a city or town. It follows that the plaintiff cannot maintain this action. Exceptions sustained.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.