Lancy v. Havender
Benjamin Lancy v. John C. P. Havender
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
W. Allen, J.
By the agreement, the plaintiff was to have one half of the amount recovered, and was to make no charge for his services and expenses; and the action is not to recover for services rendered and money paid, but for breach of the agreement. The agreement was clearly champertous under the decisions of this court. Thurston v. Percival, 1 Pick. 415 . Ackert v. Barker, 131 Mass. 436 . Belding v. Smythe, 138 Mass. 530 . In Blaisdell v. Ahern, 144 Mass. 393 , the plaintiff’s compensation was to be paid by the defendant, and the amount which might be recovered was referred to only to limit the amount with which the plaintiff might charge the defendant; in the case at bar the plaintiff undertook the collection of the debt for one half of the avails, and his only claim against the defendant is for withholding the plaintiff’s share of the amount recovered.
It is argued that the agreement does not mention a suit, and that the debt might have been collected without one. But the agreement clearly contemplated legal proceedings, and the proceedings in the Insolvency Court constituted a suit.
Judgment for the defendant.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.