TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Carpenter v. Allen

Reuben Carpenter v. William Allen & others

Carpenter v. Allen, 22 N.E. 900 (Mass. 1889)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 30, 1889
Judges
Morton
Citations
22 N.E. 900150 Mass. 2811889 Mass. LEXIS 77
Headnotes
Fixtures—Mortgage of Personal Property — Replevin. The owner of machinery attached it to his factory, which with the land under it was already subject to a mortgage, and subsequently mortgaged the machinery as personal property. The mortgagee, having foreclosed the mortgage upon the machinery for breach of condition, replevied it from a third person who had acquired possession of it, but who did not claim title to it under the mortgagor, or anybody else. Held, that a finding was warranted that the machinery was personal property belonging to such mortgagee, and that he could maintain the action of replevin.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Morton

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Morton, C. J.

This is an action of replevin of an engine and boiler. The property replevied was formerly owned by Reuben and Paris Rich, who in June, 1883, attached it to their factory in Charlton, and at the same time mortgaged it as personal property to the plaintiff. The Superior Court was justified in finding, from the fact of the giving of this mortgage, that the mortgagors agreed that the property should not become a part of the realty, but should remain personalty. The land upon which the building stood was under a mortgage to one Walker, at the time the property was attached to it. It was adjudicated in Carpenter v. Walker, 140 Mass. 416 , that the property was personal property, and passed to the plaintiff under his mortgage. This adjudication was made upon the same state of facts existing in the case at bar, so far as the title of the plaintiff is concerned.

The defendant, in some manner not disclosed, came into possession of the property after it was severed from the realty, but he does not claim any title to it, either under the Riches, or Walker, or anybody else.

It was competent for the Superior Court to find that the property passed to the plaintiff under his mortgage, and that he is entitled to maintain this action, there having been a breach of the conditions of the mortgage; Carpenter v. Walker, ubi supra, and cases cited; and the exceptions taken by the defendant George L. Allen must be overruled.

Exceptions overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1895: 11925: 11931: 118952026peak 1895 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Planter's Bank v. Lummus Cotton Gin Co.128 S.E. 876 (S.C. 1925)
  2. Wentworth v. S. A. Woods Machine Co.39 N.E. 414 (Mass. 1895)
  3. Greene v. Lampert174 N.E. 669 (Mass. 1931)

Most recent

  1. Greene v. Lampert174 N.E. 669 (Mass. 1931)
  2. Planter's Bank v. Lummus Cotton Gin Co.128 S.E. 876 (S.C. 1925)
  3. Wentworth v. S. A. Woods Machine Co.39 N.E. 414 (Mass. 1895)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Carpenter v. Walker, 5 N.E. 160 (Mass. 1886) 20

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list