Collamore v. Collamore

Writ of Entry—Devise — Estate Tail — Mortgage — Deed—Barring Entail. A testator to whom certain premises were conveyed in 1799, by his will, which was allowed in 1813, gave one half of his property to his only daughter M., “ and her heirs born of her body forever,” and the other half to his only son J. Upon a petition for partition by J. and M., the premises above mentioned were set off to M. as her share under the will. M. was twice married, and by her first husband had three sons, A., B., and C. M. and her second husband, in 1835, conveyed the premises in mortgage to a certain corporation. M. died in 1845, and by her will she gave the premises in trust for the joint benefit of her sons B. and C., who had the right to terminate the trust, and, upon request, receive a conveyance of the premises discharged of the trust. The trustee was to take the premises subject to the mortgage, which he was to pay; and the mortgage was discharged in 1865. In 1846, A., “ in consideration of five dollars ” paid to him by the trustee, “ and for other good and valuable considerations,” conveyed the premises to the trustee, “ be my right, title, interest, and estate in and to the said parcels of land, ... in whatever manner acquired, whether by devise, descent, or otherwise.” The deed, which was duly recorded, also recited that the conveyance was made for the further assuring of the title of the trustee under the will of A.’s mother, and for confirming to the trustee a full and absolute estate in fee simple therein, and also for the purpose of ratifying a conveyance of the premises with other parcels which had been made by A. jointly with B. and C. to the trustee earlier in the same year. In 1874, the administrator of the estate of C., who had died, conveyed, under a license from the Probate Court, C.’s estate in the premises to B., and in the same year the trustee under M.’s will conveyed the premises discharged of the trust to B. A. died in 1884, and his oldest son, in 1890, brought a writ of entry against B. to recover the premises. Held, that the devise to M. in her father’s will created an estate tail, and, on her death, the estate descended to A , her oldest son; that the mortgage given by M. and her husband was immaterial; that the deed oí A. in 1846 barred the entail; and that the action could not be maintained.

Writ of entry, dated January 25, 1890, to recover a parcel of land in Boston. Plea, nul disseisin. Trial in the Superior Court, before Blodgett, J., who allowed a bill of exceptions, in substance as follows. The evidence showed that George Makepeace, by a warranty deed dated September 27, 1799, duly acknowledged and recorded on September 28,1799, conveyed the demanded premises to John Hoffman, who was the demandant’s great-grandfather and the tenant’s grandfather. He died in December, 1812, leaving two children, John B. Hoffman and Maria Eliza Hoffman, surviving. The will of John Hoffman, which was duly-proved and allowed on January 18, 1813, provided, among other things, as follows: “After my said wife’s decease, I give and bequeath to my only daughter, Maria Eliza Hoffman, and her heirs born of her body forever, one half of all the property which my said wife may leave at her decease. The other half I give and bequeath to my only son, John Butler Hoffman, and his legal heirs forever, after my wife’s decease.” The demanded premises were afterwards, under a petition for partition of John B. Hoffman and Maria E. Hoffman, duly set off to Maria E. as her share as devisee under said will. Maria E. was twice married. Her first husband was Gilman Collamore. The issue of that marriage was two daughters, who died during their infancy, and three sons, — Gilman, father of the demand-ant, John H., the tenant, and George W. Her second husband was Israel Ames. Israel Ames and Maria E. in her right, by a deed dated October 15, 1835, duly acknowledged and recorded on October 29,1835, conveyed the demanded premises in mortgage, in consideration of $12,000, to the Massachusetts Hospital Life Insurance Company, by words of bargain and sale, with covenant of lawful seisin in fee in the grantors. The defeasance clause was, that upon the payment of $12,000 the deed was to be void. The mortgage was discharged in the margin on October 16, 1865. Maria E. died on November 15, 1845, leaving a will, which was duly proved and allowed on January 5, 1846, by the terms of which she bequeathed the demanded premises to George H. Kuhn, in trust for the joint and equal benefit of her two sons, John H. Collamore and George W. Collamore, with the right in them to revoke and terminate the trust, and upon.request the premises, or any part thereof, were to be conveyed to themselves discharged of the trust. The will further provided that the trustee should take the demanded premises subject to the mortgage of $12,000, and that the trustee should pay the same, so as to hold the testatrix’s husband harmless and indemnified therefrom. On January 19, 1846, Kuhn resigned the trust, and the Supreme Judicial Court, on February 2, 1846, appointed John A. Andrew trustee in place of Kuhn. By a deed dated February 5, 1846, Gilman Collamore, John H. Collamore, and George W. Collamore, in consideration of one dollar paid by Andrew, trustee, did “ grant, remise, release, and forever quitclaim unto the said Andrew, his heirs and assigns forever, all the right, title, and interest, estate, and claim which we, or either of us, have, or might have, as heirs at law of our late honored mother, Mrs. Maria Eliza Ames, late of said Boston, deceased wife of Israel Ames of said Boston, or under the last will and testament of our grandfather, John Hoffman, late of said Boston, merchant, deceased, or in any other manner acquired save the right, title, interest, estate, and claim which we have, whether jointly or severally, under the last will and testament of our late said mother, in and to the following parcels of land, with the buildings thereon,” including, among other estates, the demanded premises. This deed further referred to the fact of the resignation of Kuhn and the appointment of Andrew as trustee, and then recited as follows: “ We do hereby mean and intend to convey and confirm the premises aforesaid, with the privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging.” The habendum was to Andrew as trustee, “ for the purposes expressed in the will of our late mother, Maria E. Ames, above referred to.” The respective wives of Gilman and George joined for the purpose of release of dower. The deed was acknowledged by all the grantors, and duly recorded on February 21, 1846. By a second deed, dated December 12, 1846, Gilman Collamore, in consideration “of five dollars to me paid by John A. Andrew of Boston, in the county aforesaid, trustee under the will of Maria E. Ames, late of said Boston, deceased, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and for other good and valuable considerations me thereto moving,” by words of bargain and sale, conveyed to Andrew the demanded premises. - The deed also provided as follows: “ be my right, title, interest, and • estate in and to the said parcels of land, and each and every part of them, in whatever manner acquired, whether by devise, descent, or otherwise. This conveyance being made for the further assuring of the title of the said Andrew as trustee under the will of my said late mother, in and by which the parcels of land aforesaid were devised in trust for the benefit of my brothers, John H. Collamore and George W. Collamore, and for the confirming unto the said Andrew, trustee as aforesaid, his heirs and assigns, a full and absolute estate in fee simple therein, as also for the purpose of ratifying and confirming the grant and conveyance made by me jointly with my said brothers to the said Andrew by deed dated” February 5, 1846. Lucinda C. Collamore, wife of Gilman, joined for the purpose of release of dower, and the deed was duly acknowledged and recorded on December 31,1846. The oldest child of the demandant’s father was Maria L. H. Collamore, born on December 3, 1845 ; and it was admitted that the demandant is the oldest son of Gilman Collamore, that the latter was the oldest son of Maria E., and that he died on July 26, 1884. It further appeared that George Putnam, Jr., as administrator de bonis non of the estate of George W. Collamore, deceased, under a license from the Probate Court granted on April 13, 1874, conveyed the estate of George W. in the demanded premises to the tenant, by a deed dated May 30, 1874, duly acknowledged and recorded ; and that Andrew, as trustee, conveyed the demanded premises discharged of the trust to the tenant, by a deed dated September 3, 1874. The demandant testified that the tenant had told the demandant that he had obtained the premises partly under his mother’s will and partly at an auction sale on a judgment he had obtained against his brother George. The demandant also introduced in evidence the answers of the tenant to interrogatories propounded to him in proceedings in the Probate Court, which stated, among other things, that he did not pay Gilman anything to execute the deeds of February 5 and December 12, 1846. The judge ruled that, upon all the evidence, the jury would not be justified in returning a verdict for the demandant; and directed a verdict for the tenant. The demandant alleged exceptions.