Spaulding v. Inhabitants of Beverly
Edith B. Spaulding v. Inhabitants of Beverly
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
By the Court. There was evidence for the jury of a defect in the sidewalk caused by the presence of snow and ice, which defect might have- been remedied by reasonable care and diligence on the part of the town, and of which the town might have had knowledge by the exercise of proper care and diligence.
It is not contended that there was not evidence of the due care of the plaintiff. ■ Exceptions overruled.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.