TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Trustees of Amherst College v. Assessors of Amherst

Trs. of Amherst Coll. v. Assessors of Amherst, 53 N.E. 815 (Mass. 1899)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 16, 1899
Judges
Holmes
Citations
53 N.E. 815173 Mass. 2321899 Mass. LEXIS 1066
Headnotes
Tax upon House of President of a College— Law and Fact. At the trial of a petition for the abatement of a tax upon the house of the president of a college, upon the ground that it was exempt by Pub. Sts. c. 31, § 5, cl. 8, it appeared that before he occupied the house it had been let for a school, that be lived in it with his family, paid rent to the college and water rates, established a tennis court at his own expense, and some years at least paid for the care of the grounds, and that he paid the inside expenses. He might be found to have exercised the same control over it that he did over another house which lie previously had hired. Held, that it could not be said, as matter of law, that the house was exempt.
Summary
Appeal to the Superior Court, from the decision of the respondents, on' a petition for an abatement of a tax. Trial, without a jury, before Hardy, J., who found for the petitioners; and the respondents alleged exceptions. The facts appear in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Holmes

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Holmes, J.

This is a petition for the abatement of a tax upon the house of the president of Amherst College, upon the ground that the house was exempt by Pub. Sts. c. 11, § 5, cl. 3. The judge presiding in the Superior Court ruled, as matter of law, that the house was exempt, and reported the question. The ease came before him upon the testimony of the president, supplemented by some agreed facts. It appeared that before the occupation by the president the house had been let for a girls’ school. The president lived in it with his family, paid rent to the college and water rates, established a tennis court at his own expense, and some years at least paid for the care of the grounds. He paid the inside expenses of the house. He might be found to have exercised the same control over" it that he did over another house which he previously had hired. *233 In view of these facts, we think it impossible to say, as matter of law, that the case is not within Williams College v. Williamstown, 167 Mass. 505 . The most that could be contended is that there was evidence warranting a finding of fact that the dominant purposes of the president’s occupation were not private, but those for which the college was incorporated. It is unnecessary to state what evidence there was tending in that direction. It is enough to say that the ruling to that effect, as matter of law, was wrong. New trial ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1900: 11904: 11906: 11914: 11917: 11927: 11948: 119002026peak 1900 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
President & Trs. of Williams Coll. v. Assessors of Williamstown, 46 N.E. 394 (Mass. 1897) 16

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list