TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Young v. Inhabitants of Falmouth

Doris A. Young v. Inhabitants of Falmouth

Young v. Inhabitants of Falmouth, 66 N.E. 419 (Mass. 1903)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 27, 1903
Judges
Morton
Citations
66 N.E. 419183 Mass. 801903 Mass. LEXIS 715
Headnotes
Mechanic’s Lien. A mechanic’s lien cannot be established upon a building erected by a town for a free public library.
Summary
Petition, filed May 17, 1901, to enforce a mechanic’s lien. At the trial in the Superior Court CrasJcill, J. ruled and refused to rule as stated in the opinion, and ordered a verdict for the respondent. The petitioner alleged exceptions.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Morton

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Morton, J.

This is a petition to enforce a mechanic’s lien for labor performed in the erection of a building by the respondent town for a free public library. The case was sent to an auditor, and at the trial in the Superior Court the only evidence before the jury was the auditor’s report. The petitioner requested the judge to rule that the building and land were subject to a mechanic’s lien in his favor, and that he was entitled to recover. The judge refused so to rule and ruled that the building was not subject to a mechanic’s lien, and directed the jury to return a verdict for the respondent. The case is here on exceptions by the petitioner to the judge’s ruling and to his refusal to rule as requested.

The sole question is whether the building is subject to a mechanic’s lien. We do not think that it is. It has been decided that a sclioolhouse held by a municipal corporation for public school purposes is not subject to a mechanic’s lien, and the decision is said to be in accord with the almost unanimous current of decisions elsewhere. Lessard v. Revere, 171 Mass. 294 . Staples v. Somerville, 176 Mass. 237, 242 . The ground of decision in such cases is that the buildings are held for a public use, and it is against public policy, in the absence of express provisions to the contrary, that the instrumentalities for *81 carrying on the government should be the subject of seizure and sale for debt. It is true that cities and towns are not required to maintain public libraries as they are schools and highways for instance. But it is plain, we think, that money appropriated for the erection and maintenance of a free public library is appropriated for a public use. R. L. c. 25, § 15. Kingman v. Brockton, 153 Mass. 255 . Whether a use is public does not depend on whether it is compulsory, but on its nature and purpose. Tindley v. Salem, 137 Mass. 171 . Towns and cities derive no gain or profit from the establishment and maintenance of free public libraries any more than they do from that of free public schools. They are established solely for the general and common good, and we cannot doubt that they come within the same principle as instrumentalities of government that free public schools do.

Judgment for the respondent on the verdict.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1904: 11910: 11917: 11938: 119042026peak 1904 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Webb v. Crane Co.80 P.2d 698 (Ariz. 1938)
  2. Friedman v. County of Hampden90 N.E. 851 (Mass. 1910)
  3. A. L. & E. F. Goss Co. v. Greenleaf57 A. 581 (Me. 1904)
  4. Prindiville v. Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co.226 Mass. 148 (1917)

Most recent

  1. Webb v. Crane Co.80 P.2d 698 (Ariz. 1938)
  2. Prindiville v. Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co.226 Mass. 148 (1917)
  3. Friedman v. County of Hampden90 N.E. 851 (Mass. 1910)
  4. A. L. & E. F. Goss Co. v. Greenleaf57 A. 581 (Me. 1904)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Tindley v. City of Salem, 137 Mass. 171 (1884) 75
Kingman v. City of Brockton, 26 N.E. 998 (Mass. 1891) 47
Staples v. City of Somerville, 57 N.E. 380 (Mass. 1900) 17
Lessard v. Inhabitants of Revere, 50 N.E. 533 (Mass. 1898) 16

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list