TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Knight v. Grant

Edith H. Knight v. Sheridan U. Grant, administrator Fred Knight v. Same

Knight v. Grant, 106 N.E. 853 (Mass. 1914)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 6, 1914
Citations
106 N.E. 853219 Mass. 199
Headnotes
limitations, Statute of. Executor and Administrator. Words, “Giving bond.” In R. L. c. 141, § 9, providing that an executor or administrator, after having given due notice of his appointment, should not be held to answer to an action by a creditor of the deceased which was not commenced within two years “from the time of his giving bond,” the time of “giving bond” is the time when, upon the approval of his bond, his letter of administration is issued.
Summary
Two actions of contract against the administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Robert I. Smith, late of Lawrence, for services in the care, attendance upon and nursing of the defendant’s testate. Writs dated March 1, 1913. In the Superior Court the cases were tried before Sanderson, J. It appeared in each case that the defendant’s petition for administration was returnable in the Probate Court on February 27, 1911, that his bond as administrator was dated March 1, 1911, and that the bond was approved and his letter of administration was issued on March 9, 1911. The writs in these actions were served upon the defendant on March 3, 1913. The defendant asked for a ruling that the action was not commenced within two years from the time of his giving bond as administrator. The ruling was refused. There was a verdict for the plaintiff in the first action in the sum of $763.63, and also in the second action in the sum of $1,260.75. The defendant alleged exceptions. The cases were submitted on briefs.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court.

The statute of limitations begins to run against an administrator from the date of the letter of administration. This has been decided to be the time of “giving bond” as these words are used in R. L. c. 141, § 9. Wells v. Child, 12 Allen, 330 . *200 Therefore these actions were brought seasonably. It is too plain for discussion that there is nothing at variance with this' in Morrissey v. Morrissey, 180 Mass. 480 .

Exceptions overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1932: 11939: 21949: 119322026peak 1939 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Breen v. Burns182 N.E. 294 (Mass. 1932)
  2. French v. Ballantyne21 N.E.2d 959 (Mass. 1939)
  3. Donovan v. O'connor14 Mass. App. Div. 242 (1949)
  4. French v. Ballantyne4 Mass. App. Div. 57 (1939)

Most recent

  1. Donovan v. O'connor14 Mass. App. Div. 242 (1949)
  2. French v. Ballantyne21 N.E.2d 959 (Mass. 1939)
  3. French v. Ballantyne4 Mass. App. Div. 57 (1939)
  4. Breen v. Burns182 N.E. 294 (Mass. 1932)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Morrissey v. Morrissey, 62 N.E. 972 (Mass. 1902) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list