Donlan v. City of Boston
Esther G. Donlan v. City of Boston
Headnotes
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Braley, J.
The plaintiff’s testatrix died while in the employment of the defendant as a teacher of manual training in the public schools under a contract at a fixed yearly salary, and this action is brought to recover the balance which would have been due if she had survived the period. It is settled that as performance by her depended upon her personal judgment, ability and efforts, there was an implied condition to which the contract was subject that she should be living and physically able to do the work. Marvel v. Phillips, 162 Mass. 399, 401 . The contract therefore was terminated by her death before the year had ended. Browne v. Fairhall, 213 Mass. 290, 294 . Johnson v. Walker, 155 Mass. 253 .
But as the testatrix died during the summer vacation leaving only one month of the school year unpaid for, the plaintiff contends that this amount, being one twelfth of the salary, is collectible on the basis of the payments she had received each month as shown by her signature on the pay rolls. The contract nevertheless was entire, although the payments were made by monthly instalments. Fullam v. Wright & Colton Wire Cloth Co. 196 Mass. 474, 476 . Clark v. Gulesian, 197 Mass. 492 . Moffat v. Davitt, 200 *286 Mass. 452, 458 . And full payment having been made of all that was due when her death occurred, and further payments being conditional upon the continuance of the contract and not upon whether she was excused from the rendition of services during the succeeding month, the action cannot be maintained. Johnson v. Walker, 155 Mass. 253, 255 . Pollock on Contracts (Wald’s ed.) 543, 548.
W. J. O’Malley, for the defendant. J. Lundy, for the plaintiff.
By the terms of the report * judgment is to be entered for the defendant.
So ordered.
Made by Hamilton, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.