Gillespie v. Bopp
James Gillespie v. Louis Bopp, Jr.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Carroll, J.
This is an action of tort for assault and battery. The defendant excepted to that part of the judge’s charge, where he instructed, the jury that the burden was upon the defendant “to prove the right to use force, that is, to prove to you that he was set upon by a crowd and that he did this in self-defence.” There was a verdict for the plaintiff.
It was for the defendant to show that he acted in self-defence, and the judge correctly ruled that the burden of proving his justification for the assault was upon him. As was expressed by Dewey, J., in St. John v. Eastern Railroad, 1 Allen, 544 : “The general rule .certainly is that, in an action of trespass for an assault upon the person, the plaintiff having established the allegations in his decía *535 ration as to the assault and beating, any excuse or justification therefor is to be shown by the defendants.” Hathaway v. Hatchard, 160 Mass. 296 . Mountford v. Cunard Steamship Co. Ltd. 202 Mass. 345, 346 .
Exceptions overruled.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.