Driscoll v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Julia B. Driscoll, administratrix v. Boston Elevated Railway Company

Driscoll v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 233 Mass. 232 (1919)

Court: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided: June 23, 1919
Citations: 233 Mass. 232

Cited by 3

Headnotes

Negligence, Street railway, Causing death. At the trial of an action by an administrator against a street railway company for causing the death of the plaintiff’s intestate, the evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff tended to show that on a clear evening in November the intestate started to cross a well lighted street in a city, not at a stopping place for cars nor at a cross walk, when an electric car of the defendant, properly lighted and proceeding at a rate of about ten miles an hour, was fifty to seventy-five feet away; that the motorman sounded his gong and caused the car to slacken its speed to four or five miles an hour; that the intestate paid no attention to the car and, without walking in front of it, came into collision with its forward corner, and that the car stopped within four or five feet of the point of collison. Held, that there was no evidence warranting a verdict for the plaintiff.

Summary

Tort for causing the death of John Walsh, the plaintiff’s intestate, at twenty-five minutes after five ‘o’clock in the afternoon of November 23, 1915, on Washington Street near Palmer Street in that part of Boston known as Roxbury, as described in the opinion. Writ dated February 26, 1916. In the Superior Court, the action was tried before White, J. The evidence is described in the opinion. At the close of the evidence, upon a motion in writing by the defendant, the judge ordered a verdict for the defendant; and, the verdict having been returned, by agreement of the parties, reported the case to this court upon the following terms: If the judge was right in ordering the verdict, judgment was to be entered for the defendant upon the verdict; but if there was sufficient evidence to entitle the plaintiff to have the case submitted to the jury, then judgment was to be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,500, with interest and costs.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court.

This is an action to recover damages for the death of John Walsh. The evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff tended to show that on a clear November evening the deceased started to cross a well lighted Boston street, not near a stopping place for cars or cross walk, when a trolley car of the defendant, properly lighted and then proceeding at about ten miles an hour, was fifty to seventy-five feet away. The motorman sounded his gong repeatedly and was seen to be “working his brake handle.” “The car slowed down to about four or five miles an hour.” The deceased paid no attention to the car and, without walking in front of it, came into collision with its forward corner. The car stopped within four or five feet. The testimony of the motorman was that he “shut off the power . . . and threw over the reverse lever, and put on a notch or two of power, at the same time putting on his brake ... As soon as his reverse was set he eased his brake a little, to give the reverse a chance to work . . . when going forward you have first to overcome the forward motion of the wheels before they will revolve backward. He did all he could to stop the car, but did not have space enough.”

It is manifest that as matter of law there was no evidence to warrant a verdict for the plaintiff. Boyle v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway, 231 Mass. 184 , Anger v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway, 231 Mass. 163 , and decisions collected in each opinion. Pigeon v. Massachusetts Northeastern Street Railway, 230 Mass. 392 .

Judgment for the defendant on the verdict.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →

State Highest Courts3

Relies on it most ⓘ

Hicks v. H. B. Church Truck Service Co.156 N.E. 254 (Mass. 1927)
Will v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.142 N.E. 44 (Mass. 1924)
Ristuccia v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.186 N.E. 592 (Mass. 1933)

Most recent

Ristuccia v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.186 N.E. 592 (Mass. 1933)
Hicks v. H. B. Church Truck Service Co.156 N.E. 254 (Mass. 1927)
Will v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.142 N.E. 44 (Mass. 1924)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Pigeon v. Mass. Northeastern St. Ry. Co., 230 Mass. 392 (1918)	48
	Anger v. Worcester Consol. St. Ry. Co., 120 N.E. 399 (Mass. 1918)	10
	Boyle v. Worcester Consol. St. Ry. Co., 231 Mass. 184 (1918)	6

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list