TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Inhabitants of Framingham v. Commissioner of Banks

Inhabitants of Framingham v. Commissioner of Banks in re Tremont Trust Company City of Cambridge v. Same

Inhabitants of Framingham v. Comm'r of Banks, 133 N.E. 629 (Mass. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 14, 1922
Judges
Rugg
Citations
133 N.E. 629240 Mass. 2531922 Mass. LEXIS 754
Headnotes
Municipal Corporations. Trust Company, In liquidation. A city or town, as a creditor in the commercial department of a trust company of whose property and business the commissioner of banks has taken possession under G. L. c. 167, § 22, should not be given a preference over general creditors of the trust company. Following Commonwealth v. Commissioner of Banks, ante, 244.
Summary
Two bills IN equity, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court respectively on September 13 and on October 3,1921, against the commissioner of banks, the first seeking a decree that a debt of $16,887.76, admitted by the commissioner, in possession under St. 1910, c. 399, § 2, of the property and business of the Tremont Trust Company, to be due to the town of Framingham in the commercial department of that bank, be preferred before all general debts of the bank except debts due to the United States arid that the commissioner be directed to pay the indebtedness in full with interest. In the second suit similar relief was sought with regard to a debt of $262,791.90 due to the city of Cambridge. The defendant demurred to each bill. The suits were consolidated and were heard together upon the demurrers by Braley, J., by whose order decrees were entered dismissing the bills. Each plaintiff appealed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Rugg

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Rugg, C. J.

These are bills in equity brought by municipalities against the commissioner of banks, who is in possession of the Tremont Trust Company under authority of G. L. c. 167, §' 22. The plaintiffs were depositors in that institution when it was closed on February 17, 1921. They seek to establish a preference for themselves in the payment of their claims over other depositors. Every contention put forward in behalf of the plaintiffs is settled adversely to them by Commonwealth v. Commissioner of Banks, ante, 244, just decided. In each case the entry must be Decree dismissing bill affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1933: 119332026peak 1933 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Commissioner of Banks v. Highland Trust Co.186 N.E. 229 (Mass. 1933)

Most recent

  1. Commissioner of Banks v. Highland Trust Co.186 N.E. 229 (Mass. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list