TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Norman Allen Ayers v. Kenneth E. Taylor Attorney General of the State of Maryland

Ayers v. Kenneth E. Taylor Attorney Gen. of the State of Md., 8 F.3d 816 (4th Cir. 1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 29, 1993
Docket
No. 93-8034
Citations
8 F.3d 8161993 WL 4388931993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34692
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

8 F.3d 816

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Norman Allen AYERS, Petitioner, v. Kenneth E. TAYLOR; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents.

No. 93-8034.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 27, 1993. Decided: October 29, 1993.

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Application for writ of habeas corpus transferred by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Allen Ayers, Petitioner Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, for Respondents.

WRIT TRANSFERRED

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION 1

Norman Allen Ayers petitions this Court to exercise its original jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (a) (1988), over his application for a writ of habeas corpus as to his Maryland state conviction. We decline to entertain Ayers' application and transfer it to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland for disposition. *28 U.S.C. § 2241 (b) (1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TRANSFERRED * We defer to the district court's disposition of Ayers' motion to proceed in forma pauperis

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list