TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bychower v. United Cigar Stores Co.

Rebecca Bychower v. United Cigar Stores Company Same v. S. S. Kresge Company

Bychower v. United Cigar Stores Co., 149 N.E. 411 (Mass. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 12, 1925
Citations
149 N.E. 411253 Mass. 5421925 Mass. LEXIS 1286

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court.

These are actions of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, while a traveller on the sidewalk of a public street, under circumstances which would warrant a finding that the plaintiff was in the exercise of due care and that the sidewalk was in a defective condition by reason of snow and ice fallen from the building numbered 60 Pleasant Street, Malden, and there accumulated. The defendant United Cigar Stores Company was in occupation of the building as tenant under a lease, whereby it was obligated to keep the building in such repair as might be required to prevent such an accumulation of snow and ice on the sidewalk. A notice in due form, directed to the owners of the building by their proper names, was seasonably served on them. A copy of that notice, not mentioning or naming the tenant, enclosed in an envelope having on its face “United Cigar Stores Co., 60 Pleasant Street, Malden,” was delivered seasonably to a clerk of that company at that place.

This did not constitute such notice as is required by G. L. c. 84, § 21, as amended by St. 1922, c. 241. The case is covered completely in principle by Sweet v. Pecker, 223 Mass. 286 . The notice in some way ought to have named or described the tenant in order to be the foundation of an action against it. It is not contended that the S. S. Kresge Company can be held hable.

In each case the Verdict is to stand.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 11935: 11939: 11948: 11967: 11972: 11980: 119272026peak 1927 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Blanchard v. Stone's Inc.24 N.E.2d 688 (Mass. 1939)
  2. Urban v. Simes156 N.E. 697 (Mass. 1927)
  3. Grueby v. Chase Harris Forbes Corp.197 N.E. 624 (Mass. 1935)
  4. Ferreira v. Gross80 N.E.2d 481 (Mass. 1948)
  5. MacLachlan v. Brotherhood Oil Corp.404 N.E.2d 1272 (Mass. App. Ct. 1980)
  6. Lindahl v. Sullivan281 N.E.2d 231 (Mass. 1972)

Most recent

  1. MacLachlan v. Brotherhood Oil Corp.404 N.E.2d 1272 (Mass. App. Ct. 1980)
  2. Lindahl v. Sullivan281 N.E.2d 231 (Mass. 1972)
  3. Kyriacopoulos v. Roman Catholic Bishop38 Mass. App. Dec. 14 (1967)
  4. Ferreira v. Gross80 N.E.2d 481 (Mass. 1948)
  5. Blanchard v. Stone's Inc.24 N.E.2d 688 (Mass. 1939)
  6. Grueby v. Chase Harris Forbes Corp.197 N.E. 624 (Mass. 1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Sweet v. Pecker, 111 N.E. 908 (Mass. 1916) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list