TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rankin v. Wordell & McGuire Co.

Ellen Rankin v. Wordell and McGuire Company

Rankin v. Wordell & McGuire Co., 149 N.E. 609 (Mass. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 25, 1925
Judges
Braley
Citations
149 N.E. 609254 Mass. 1091925 Mass. LEXIS 1313

Opinion of the Court — Braley

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Braley, J.

The exceptions state there was evidence tending to show that the plaintiff, while walking on a public way in front of the defendant’s store on February 28, 1920, slipped and fell on frozen snow, the fall causing serious personal injuries for which she seeks damages. The answer was a general denial, and the jury could find that because of the defendant’s negligence snow had been so pushed back, piled and left on the sidewalk as to render it unsafe for the use of pedestrians. But the plaintiff could not recover without introducing evidence from which it could be found that within ten days after the date of injury she gave notice in writing to the defendant corporation of the time, place and cause of the injury. G. L. c. 84, §§ 18, 21. It is a condition precedent to the right to maintain the action. Baird v. Baptist Society, 208 Mass. 29 . The conversation descriptive of the accident between the plaintiff and the defendant’s treasurer and general manager, and the memorandum then made by the defendant’s bookkeeper, as well as subsequent statements in writing showing an account of it prepared by a person sent by the manager, although signed by the plaintiff, are-insufficient to show compliance with the statute. Erickson v. Buckley, 230 Mass. 467 . Haverty v. Ernst, 232 Mass. 543 . The verdict for the defendant was ordered rightly.

Exceptions overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 21928: 11935: 11948: 11995: 119272026peak 1927 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Godfrey v. Building Commissioner161 N.E. 819 (Mass. 1928)
  2. Miller v. Rosenthal155 N.E. 3 (Mass. 1927)
  3. Urban v. Simes156 N.E. 697 (Mass. 1927)
  4. Grueby v. Chase Harris Forbes Corp.197 N.E. 624 (Mass. 1935)
  5. January v. Town of Marshfield1995 Mass. App. Div. 145 (1995)
  6. Goff v. Hickson13 Mass. App. Div. 27 (1948)

Most recent

  1. January v. Town of Marshfield1995 Mass. App. Div. 145 (1995)
  2. Goff v. Hickson13 Mass. App. Div. 27 (1948)
  3. Grueby v. Chase Harris Forbes Corp.197 N.E. 624 (Mass. 1935)
  4. Godfrey v. Building Commissioner161 N.E. 819 (Mass. 1928)
  5. Urban v. Simes156 N.E. 697 (Mass. 1927)
  6. Miller v. Rosenthal155 N.E. 3 (Mass. 1927)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Erickson v. Buckley, 120 N.E. 126 (Mass. 1918) 45
Baird v. Baptist Soc'y, 94 N.E. 296 (Mass. 1911) 28
Haverty v. Ernst, 232 Mass. 543 (1919) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list