Kronick v. Correale
Jacob Kronick & others v. Alphonse Correale & others
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
By the Court.
This suit cannot be maintained unless the plaintiffs prove that the male defendants were copartners. The judge made an express finding of fact that the burden of proof had not been sustained. There was no error of law in making this finding. It was peculiarly the province of the trial judge to settle that question. His action in this particular will not be disturbed. In view of this finding of fact, all the requests of the plaintiff were denied rightly. The circumstance that the bill was taken for confessed against one defendant did not bind the other defendants. Goff v. Hathaway, 180 Mass. 497 .
Decree dismissing bill affirmed with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.