TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Chase v. Smith

William R. Chase v. Rosella Smith, & another

Chase v. Smith, 153 N.E. 452 (Mass. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 14, 1926
Citations
153 N.E. 452257 Mass. 2521926 Mass. LEXIS 1320

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court.

This is a petition in equity to determine the ownership of a bank book. James F. Chase, the testator, had a deposit in a savings bank in his own name. On December 7, 1923, he changed the deposit to the account of “William R. Chase or James F. Chase or the survivor.” There was testimony to the effect that the testator told William R. Chase what he had done about the deposit in the savings bank, and that William R. Chase assented to the deposit and thanked him for his kindness, and that the testator stated to a third person that he had deposited money in the savings bank for William R. Chase, after having thought it all over carefully. The treasurer of the savings bank testified “that he informed James F. Chase on the date that he transferred the money to a joint account and before said transfer that either he or William would have a right to it and that it was subject to attachment against either and that James F. Chase thoroughly understood what he was doing when he made the transfer.” William R. Chase never had actual possession of the bank book, but saw it either before or shortly after the death of the testator.

The probate judge found as a fact that the testator made a valid gift unequivocally declared and executed in favor of William R. Chase who assented thereto.

On this evidence and finding, the case at bar is governed by Battles v. Millbury Savings Bank, 250 Mass. 180 .

Decree affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 21930: 21931: 11934: 11936: 11972: 119272026peak 1927 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Christensen v. Ogden State Bank286 P. 638 (Utah 1930)
  2. Blanchette v. Blanchette287 N.E.2d 459 (Mass. 1972)
  3. Gibbons v. Gibbons4 N.E.2d 1019 (Mass. 1936)
  4. Brodrick v. O'Connor171 N.E. 479 (Mass. 1930)
  5. McKenna v. McKenna157 N.E. 517 (Mass. 1927)
  6. Graham v. Barnes156 N.E. 865 (Mass. 1927)

Most recent

  1. Blanchette v. Blanchette287 N.E.2d 459 (Mass. 1972)
  2. Gibbons v. Gibbons4 N.E.2d 1019 (Mass. 1936)
  3. Bedirian v. Zorian191 N.E. 448 (Mass. 1934)
  4. Barron v. Barronian175 N.E. 271 (Mass. 1931)
  5. Brodrick v. O'Connor171 N.E. 479 (Mass. 1930)
  6. Christensen v. Ogden State Bank286 P. 638 (Utah 1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Battles v. Millbury Sav. Bank, 145 N.E. 55 (Mass. 1924) 39

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list