Gregory John Margerum v. Jim Musselman Dave Bolejack Avery Phipps
Opinion
8 F.3d 819
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Gregory John MARGERUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim MUSSELMAN; Dave Bolejack; Avery Phipps, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6645.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 27, 1993. Decided: October 26, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Gregory John Margerum, Appellant Pro Se.
William Fain Rutherford, Jr., Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Woods, Rogers & Hazelgrove, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION 1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Margerum v. Musselman, No. CA-93-251-R (W.D. Va. May 14, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.