TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fine v. Kahn

Morris Fine v. Flora Kahn

Fine v. Kahn, 170 N.E. 462 (Mass. 1930)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 6, 1930
Judges
Rugg
Citations
170 N.E. 462270 Mass. 5571930 Mass. LEXIS 1058

Opinion of the Court — Rugg

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Rugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort whereby the plaintiff seeks to recover compensation for injuries to person and property caused by reason of collision with a motor vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff was the owner and driver of one of the two motor vehicles involved in the accident. The trial judge, hearing the case without a jury, found upon all the evidence that the real name of the plaintiff was Morris R. Fine “but that at times he used and was known by the name of Murray R. Fine,” and that the motor vehicle owned and driven by him at the time of the accident was registered in the name of Murray R. Fine.

This was not equivalent to a finding that the plaintiff was commonly known by the name Murray R. Fine. The finding at most means that once in a while he assumed that name. The finding goes no further than to indicate that in restricted connections and on separated, and perhaps rare, occasions he was known by the name in which his motor vehicle was registered. It falls far short of indicating that the name in which it was registered revealed his identity and gave a descriptive statement by which he could readily be found in the community. The motor vehicle of the plaintiff was not registered in accordance with G. L. c. 90, § 2, as amended. It was therefore an outlaw on the highway. Since the judge further found that the injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff were not recklessly or wantonly inflicted by the defendant, he correctly ruled that the plaintiff’s motor vehicle was not registered according to law and was a trespasser upon the highway, and that the plaintiff had no rights against other travelers except to be protected from reckless or wanton injury. Fairbanks v. Kemp, 226 Mass. 75 . Bacon v. Boston Elevated Railway, 256 Mass. 30 . Crompton v. Williams, 216 Mass. 184 . Koley v. Williams, 265 Mass. 601 .

Exceptions overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →
1930: 11931: 11932: 11933: 11934: 21935: 11937: 21939: 11940: 11941: 31945: 119302026peak 1941 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Potter v. Gilmore184 N.E. 373 (Mass. 1933)
  2. Di Cecca v. Bucci178 N.E. 447 (Mass. 1931)
  3. Lacoste v. Fagin2 Mass. App. Div. 228 (1937)
  4. Bridges v. Hart18 N.E.2d 1020 (Mass. 1939)
  5. Brewer v. Hayes285 Mass. 144 (1934)
  6. Topf v. Holland193 N.E. 364 (Mass. 1934)

Most recent

  1. Korsun v. McManus63 N.E.2d 457 (Mass. 1945)
  2. Superior Motors Transportation Co. v. Baier2 Mass. App. Dec. 12 (1941)
  3. Superior Motors Transportation Co. v. Baier6 Mass. App. Div. 467 (1941)
  4. White v. Foxboro-Mansfield Bus Co.6 Mass. App. Div. 119 (1941)
  5. Corliss v. Wilson5 Mass. App. Div. 137 (1940)
  6. Bridges v. Hart18 N.E.2d 1020 (Mass. 1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Crompton v. Williams, 103 N.E. 298 (Mass. 1913) 36
Fairbanks v. Kemp, 226 Mass. 75 (1917) 30
Bacon v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 152 N.E. 35 (Mass. 1926) 25
Koley v. Williams, 265 Mass. 601 (1929) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list