TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Attorney General v. O'Brien

Attorney General v. John D. O'Brien.

Attorney Gen. v. O'Brien, 280 Mass. 300 (1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 15, 1932
Citations
280 Mass. 300

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

*301 There was a hearing at the sitting of the full court at Springfield on September 22, 1932. The guardian ad litem reported in writing that, after having examined the petition of the Attorney General, the official hospital records, and after having personally interviewed the doctors whose affidavits were affixed to the petition, the various doctors and attendants at the United States Veterans’ Administration Hospital at Northampton, the personal physicians of the respondent, relatives and others, and after having carefully interviewed and examined the respondent at the hospital, he had concluded that he did not care to be heard in opposition to the allowance of the petition. Oral testimony of experts in mental diseases also was heard. After *302 taking the matter under advisement, the following judgment was entered:

“At Springfield in the County of Hampden, September 22, 1932.

“Present: Rugg, C.J., Crosby, Wait, Donahue, & Lummus, JJ.

“The petition of the Attorney General for the removal of John D. O’Brien,from the office of Register of Probate and Insolvency for the County of Hampden having been heretofore presented to a majority of the justices of said Court and an order of notice having been issued thereon and a return of the service of the same upon said John D. O’Brien having been made, and William G. McKechnie, Esquire, appointed as guardian ad litem of said John D. O’Brien having appeared in his behalf and made report to the Court, and full opportunity having been given for the presentation of all evidence material to determination of the'issues raised under said petition:

“It appearing, upon the hearing of evidence, that said John D. O’Brien has become wholly incompetent and unable to perform the duties of his office, by reason of mental disease, and has ceased to perform such duties, and that the public good so requires, it is ordered by the above named justices, they being a majority of the justices of said Court, under the authority conferred by the General Laws, chapter 211, section 4, that the said John D. O’Brien be and he hereby is removed from the office of Register of Probate and Insolvency for the County of Hampden.

Arthur P. Rugg.

; John C. Crosby.

William Cushing Wait.

Charles H. Donahue.

Henry T. Lummus.”

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1938: 11993: 119382026peak 1938 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate300 Mass. 596 (1938)
  2. In re Dugan623 N.E.2d 1104 (Mass. 1993)

Most recent

  1. In re Dugan623 N.E.2d 1104 (Mass. 1993)
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate300 Mass. 596 (1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list