Mergupis v. Hackett
George S. Mergupis v. George R. Hackett & another
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Petition denied and judgment affirmed. In each of these cases, the plaintiff appeals from an order of a judge of the Superior Court denying the plaintiff’s petition to vacate a judgment for the defendant. The records were consolidated for transmission to this court. They contain nothing but the petitions to vacate, the orders denying the petitions, and the allegations in the petitions that judgment was entered on a nonsuit and that the plaintiff had *760 a meritorious cause of action. The appeals present no matter of law. The cases are governed by Cobb v. Hale, 172 Mass. 387 , and Holt v. Roberts, 175 Mass. 558 .
Timothy J. McInerney, for the plaintiff. No argument nor brief for the defendants.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.