TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wayland School Building Committee v. Cardarelli Construction Co.

Wayland School Building Committee v. Cardarelli Construction Co., Inc. & another

Wayland Sch. Bldg. Comm. v. Cardarelli Constr. Co., 208 N.E.2d 228 (Mass. 1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 8, 1965
Citations
208 N.E.2d 228349 Mass. 7661965 Mass. LEXIS 954

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Decree affirmed. The plaintiff seeks, inter alia, a declaratory determination as to whether a general bid submitted by the lowest bidder for a public construction contract was in vio- *767 lotion of G. L. c. 149, §§ 44A-44L, as amended. There is a statement of agreed facts, which we need not recite. The trial judge ruled that there was no violation of the statute by the bidder, and decreed that the plaintiff “shall not hold invalid nor reject the general bid of . . . [the bidder] because of any claimed invalidity of ... [a certain subbid] or because of any error in the list of subbidders prepared by the awarding authority.” The defendant Cardarelli Construction Co., Inc., the next lowest general bidder, appealed. The judge’s findings of fact, rulings of law, and order for decree comprise a full and accurate treatment of the issues, and require no separate discussion by us. We are satisfied that there was no error.

John E. Lecomte for Cardarelli Construction Co., Inc. Morris N. Gould for Alexander Associates, Inc. Frank W. Kilburn, Town Counsel, for the plaintiff.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Burgess & Blacher Co. v. Beverly Housing Authority217 N.E.2d 773 (Mass. 1966)

Most recent

  1. Burgess & Blacher Co. v. Beverly Housing Authority217 N.E.2d 773 (Mass. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list