Wilson v. Wilson
Charles P. Wilson v. Adrienne S. Wilson
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
This petition by a husband to revoke a decree for separate support was previously here on his appeal from a decree dismissing the petition, and that decree was reversed. 349 Mass. 29 . The petition has now been heard anew and granted by another judge, and the wife has appealed. The evidence is not reported. There is a report of material facts. G. L. c. 215, § 11 (as amended through St. 1947, e. 365, § 3). The report contains much unnecessary verbiage and is not in a form suitable for consideration on appeal. We have discarded the useless rhetoric, and are able “properly to adjudicate the subject matter” on the balance of the report. Accordingly, we do not order a further report under G. L. c. 231, § 125A, inserted by St. 1949, e. 171, § 1, as amended by St. 1963, c. 74, § 2. See Moutinho v. Moutinho, 342 Mass. 171, 173 . No error of substance appears.
Decree affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.