Bertrand v. Reback
Irene Bertrand & another v. Leah Reback, individually and as administratrix
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
One of the plaintiffs’ exceptions relates to the use of interrogatories to which the plaintiffs did not object when the answers were introduced in evidence. The other relates to the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial and the requests for rulings in connection with the motion. There is no merit to the plaintiffs’ argument that the judge was required “to hear counsel on the principles set forth in the requests.” The exceptions are frivolous and approach absurdity. Double costs are to be assessed under G. L. c. 211, § 10.
Exceptions overruled.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.