Rudnicki v. Hearst Corp.
Chester Rudnicki v. The Hearst Corporation & others
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In this action of tort each of the three defendants demurred to the declaration, and each demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff demurred to the answers filed by each defendant and these demurrers were overruled. The plaintiff moved for judgment against all the defendants and this motion was denied. From these orders the plaintiff appealed. The order denying the motion for *801 judgment was not appealable. Wishnewsky v. Saugus, 325 Mass. 191, 192 .
Chester Rudnicki, pro se. Gerald May for The Hearst Corporation. Robert T. Capeless for the Boston Herald-Traveler Corporation. Robert J. Hallisey for the Globe Newspaper Company.
There was no error.
Orders sustaining defendants’ demurrers affirmed.
Orders overruling plaintiff’s demurrers affirmed.
Appeal from order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment dismissed.
Judgments for defendants.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.