TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Labao v. Rudnicki

Gabriel Labao v. Chester Rudnicki

Labao v. Rudnicki, 258 N.E.2d 70 (Mass. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 14, 1970
Citations
258 N.E.2d 70357 Mass. 772

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

In this action of summary process commenced in a District Court there was a finding for the plaintiff for possession. Following the disallowance of a report by the trial judge, the defendant brought a petition in the Appellate Division for the establishment of the report. That court correctly ruled that it was without jurisdiction for the reason that appeals in summary process cases lie to the Superior Court. See G. L. c. 239, § 3, as amended.

Order dismissing petition affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1976: 11987: 11996: 11997: 11998: 12001: 119762026peak 1976 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kargman v. Superior Court357 N.E.2d 300 (Mass. 1976)
  2. Corcoran Management Co. v. Michaelangelo1996 Mass. App. Div. 130 (1996)
  3. Oakwood Realty Trust v. O'Brien1997 Mass. App. Div. 196 (1997)
  4. Gloucester Bank & Trust Co. v. Ferrara1998 Mass. App. Div. 18 (1998)
  5. DiGiambattista v. Orlandella1987 Mass. App. Div. 177 (1987)
  6. Rendek v. Hodgson2001 Mass. App. Div. 120 (2001)

Most recent

  1. Rendek v. Hodgson2001 Mass. App. Div. 120 (2001)
  2. Gloucester Bank & Trust Co. v. Ferrara1998 Mass. App. Div. 18 (1998)
  3. Oakwood Realty Trust v. O'Brien1997 Mass. App. Div. 196 (1997)
  4. Corcoran Management Co. v. Michaelangelo1996 Mass. App. Div. 130 (1996)
  5. DiGiambattista v. Orlandella1987 Mass. App. Div. 177 (1987)
  6. Kargman v. Superior Court357 N.E.2d 300 (Mass. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list