Orasz v. Colonial Tavern, Inc.
Michael Orasz v. Colonial Tavern, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The defendant appeals from an order of the Appellate Division dismissing a report in an action of tort for assault and battery. According to the report, the plaintiff, a patron of the defendant’s tavern, was beaten with a blackjack and kicked by a bartender employed by the defendant to maintain order and decorum, and the assault was committed by the bartender “for the purpose of accomplishing the work of the defendant and within the scope of his employment.” Two other bartenders testified for the defendant that they and a doorman were present during the affray, and one of them testified that the plaintiff called the first bartender a “faggot” before the bartender directed any remarks to the plaintiff. In our opinion the evidence reported warranted the trial judge and the Appellate Division in concluding that the bartender was acting within the scope of his employment. Ridge v. J. J. Foley Cafe, Inc. 318 Mass. 310, 311 , and cases cited. See Suckney v. Bert P. Williams, Inc. 355 Mass. 62, 64-65 . We need not *882 consider the suggestion that there may have been negligence in the defendant’s selection of personnel.
Thomas C. Cameron for the defendant. John M. Mullen (John G. Kilpatrick, Jr., with him) for the plaintiff.
Order dismissing report affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.