Hertz Corporation v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc.
The Hertz Corporation v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc., Leonard Solomon, Dollar Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc., Sundance Carriage Corp., Atlas Rent-A-Car, Inc., Enterprise Leasing Co., Value Rent-A-Car, Inc., Vehicle Management Services, Inc.
Opinion
10 F.3d 768w 27 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1273
The HERTZ CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALAMO RENT-A-CAR, INC., Leonard Solomon, Dollar Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc., Sundance Carriage Corp., Atlas Rent-A-Car, Inc., Enterprise Leasing Co., Value Rent-A-Car, Inc., Vehicle Management Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-4383.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 3, 1994. Opinion Vacated and Withdrawn on Denial of Rehearing March 21, 1994.
1
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE 16 F.3d 1126 .
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“If a vocational expert’s hypothetical does not reflect all the [plaintiff’s] limitations, then the . . . testimony has no evidentiary value . . .”)
-
(If a state court makes factual findings without an opportunity 11 for the petitioner to present evidence, the fact-finding process may be deficient and the state court 12 opinion may not be entitled to deference.)
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.